Search found 596 matches
- Mon Jun 30, 2025 10:59 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: TcpUpdate Error
- Replies: 6
- Views: 33
Re: TcpUpdate Error
If you have any of your tasks at MAIN_PRIO-1, that would be 49
- Mon Jun 30, 2025 10:58 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: TcpUpdate Error
- Replies: 6
- Views: 33
Re: TcpUpdate Error
Its not used by the system anywhere else. What do you get if you add TCP update to an example like SimpleHtml?
- Mon Jun 30, 2025 9:39 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: TcpUpdate Error
- Replies: 6
- Views: 33
Re: TcpUpdate Error
I don't see the string "TcpUpdate Error:" anywhere in our code. Is that something in your app?
- Fri Jun 20, 2025 10:18 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Docker and/or command-line builds of NNDK v2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2100
Re: Docker and/or command-line builds of NNDK v2
Hi,
That makes sense to be backwards compatible. Please not the 5282 went EOL a year ago, so if that is the only other platform of concern it might be ok to got to 3.x.
That makes sense to be backwards compatible. Please not the 5282 went EOL a year ago, so if that is the only other platform of concern it might be ok to got to 3.x.
- Thu Jun 19, 2025 2:42 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Docker and/or command-line builds of NNDK v2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2100
Re: Docker and/or command-line builds of NNDK v2
You can run 2.x or 3.x tools on your MOD54415, so you can move your code over to 3.x and then have a linux release. Are you trying to automate a build, or is it that you prefer to develop on your own linux machine?
- Wed Jun 18, 2025 9:50 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: DSCP
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3695
Re: DSCP
I've been told that if you open a support ticket we should be able to add that for you, as long as your not looking for the router config to go with it.
- Wed Jun 18, 2025 5:50 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: DSCP
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3695
Re: DSCP
Hello,
What platform and tools rev are you using?
What platform and tools rev are you using?
- Wed Jun 18, 2025 2:45 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Hardware
- Topic: Factory state of Netburner (MODXXXX) products
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2743
Re: Factory state of Netburner (MODXXXX) products
Thanks for letting us know AlokD. One more note since the MOD5441X and NANO54415 products can run both 2.x and 3.x tool sets: because those platforms came out prior to 3.x, all units ship with a 2.x factory application so people in situations like yours are not affected. For those using 3.x, once ...
- Tue May 06, 2025 12:27 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Hardware
- Topic: Migrating from EOL MOD5282 to a replacement supporting CAN
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10638
Re: Migrating from EOL MOD5282 to a replacement supporting CAN
Hello Alok,
Thank you for the update. You are correct, ARM processors require the 3.x tools. Can you provide any more details on why going from 2.9.7 to 3.x would require a lot of change? So far in my experience, other than the web processing, not much change has been necessary. Although I have not ...
Thank you for the update. You are correct, ARM processors require the 3.x tools. Can you provide any more details on why going from 2.9.7 to 3.x would require a lot of change? So far in my experience, other than the web processing, not much change has been necessary. Although I have not ...
- Mon Apr 28, 2025 9:03 am
- Forum: NetBurner Hardware
- Topic: Migrating from EOL MOD5282 to a replacement supporting CAN
- Replies: 4
- Views: 10638
Re: Migrating from EOL MOD5282 to a replacement supporting CAN
Hello AlokD,
1. Yes, those pin functions all match. Mechanically, the headers, mounting holes and Ethernet jacks are the same across the MODxxxx product line. The length of the MOD5441x is about 0.25 inches longer than the MOD5282. This is the dimension opposite the RJ-45 jack. So it does not ...
1. Yes, those pin functions all match. Mechanically, the headers, mounting holes and Ethernet jacks are the same across the MODxxxx product line. The length of the MOD5441x is about 0.25 inches longer than the MOD5282. This is the dimension opposite the RJ-45 jack. So it does not ...