Search found 541 matches
- Thu Mar 05, 2020 3:24 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: MODM7AE70 Canbus
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2689
Re: MODM7AE70 Canbus
If you do not see an example that you are looking for, please contact NetBurner support directly. They may have examples that are not published.
- Fri Feb 28, 2020 3:49 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Hardware
- Topic: mod54415 rev2.1 config record corrupt
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1959
Re: mod54415 rev2.1 config record corrupt
I would first try the jumper recovery procedure, which will load a default configuration copy of the config record. Then change the parameters you need and save. The application config record is in parallel flash, and it can be corrupted by an errant application. But the jumper recovery was designed...
- Thu Feb 27, 2020 5:04 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: CB34EX to SB800EX: EFFS/FAT Fails
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5094
Re: CB34EX to SB800EX: EFFS/FAT Fails
Yes, it has worked for quite some time. What tools revision are you using? Can you try the \nburn\examples\SB800EX\SDHC-FlashCard example and tell me if it works for you?
- Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:17 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Serial comm problem in Nano monitor v1.02
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3406
Re: Serial comm problem in Nano monitor v1.02
Hello, We were able to determine the issue was caused by a change made to the alternate boot monitor. That has been corrected, and the revision moved to 1.03. We still have regression testing to do before it can be released to production. Are you able to program the boards you have using a lower bau...
- Fri Feb 07, 2020 9:24 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Serial comm problem in Nano monitor v1.02
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3406
Re: Serial comm problem in Nano monitor v1.02
Hello, I was finally able to reproduce the behavior you describe. I have asked engineering to look into it. There is a lot of software involved, so I do not have a time frame on the effort. The boot monitor is a low level interface that uses polling rather than interrupts. and is meant to be a termi...
- Thu Feb 06, 2020 8:27 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Serial comm problem in Nano monitor v1.02
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3406
Re: Serial comm problem in Nano monitor v1.02
Hello,
Thank you for testing in the nano carrier board. I tested additional 1.02 boards, and they are functioning fine for me, so I'm not quite sure what to try next in this case. Just as a data point, does it make any difference if you reduce the baud rate?
Thank you for testing in the nano carrier board. I tested additional 1.02 boards, and they are functioning fine for me, so I'm not quite sure what to try next in this case. Just as a data point, does it make any difference if you reduce the baud rate?
- Mon Feb 03, 2020 12:29 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Crash implementing dual-stack
- Replies: 22
- Views: 8393
Re: Crash implementing dual-stack
Binary, or do you build it from source? If binary, then you should ask DMH what version they built it with, and if they use the m_alignint flag.
What version are you using, and are you using m_alignint? If this is a mis-match, then it affects structures and classes.
What version are you using, and are you using m_alignint? If this is a mis-match, then it affects structures and classes.
- Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:03 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Crash implementing dual-stack
- Replies: 22
- Views: 8393
Re: Crash implementing dual-stack
I didn't see an answer to the library question. Are you using any 3rd party libraries, or have you made any of your own?
- Sat Feb 01, 2020 8:47 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Static library can't allocate memory
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2826
Re: Static library can't allocate memory
Hello, Glad you have it working. Where did you make the modification for the flag? I don't have a version as old as 2.8.8, but in 2.9.2 I see in ldflags.mak: ifndef CPUFLAG CPUFLAG = mcpu=54415 endif NBINCLUDE="$(NBROOT)/include" -I"$(NBROOT)/NANO54415/include" LDFLAGS = -$(CPUFL...
- Thu Jan 30, 2020 7:10 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Crash implementing dual-stack
- Replies: 22
- Views: 8393
Re: Crash implementing dual-stack
I agree with sulliwk06. I realize you are suggesting the compiler, but looking at this as an outsider and not an author of the code: - This problem isn't happening with any other code or apps I am aware of. We use IPADDR in classes all the time. - Accessing an IPADDR as a 32 bit number can certainly...