Search found 445 matches
- Mon Mar 10, 2014 9:43 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Confusion with calculation of ram usage
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8657
Re: Confusion with calculation of ram usage
For primitives (aka, non-(C++)objects) allocation itself does not do anything; all it does is affect what offset the output assembly uses to access the "variable". This is one of the things where i am confused. I might as well have replaced char buffer[4096]; with char *buffer, as it seem...
- Sat Mar 08, 2014 7:04 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Confusion with calculation of ram usage
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8657
Re: Confusion with calculation of ram usage
Thanks guys for the tips. But i am not getting my point across. It seems to many are looking at the example i posted as what i am actually doing rather than looking at it as an example to get the point across. It seems to be causing them to focus on the example and the question. rsg, gave me a good ...
- Sat Mar 08, 2014 3:49 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Confusion with calculation of ram usage
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8657
Re: Confusion with calculation of ram usage
Lets switch this up. We agree that when placing a variable in a function does not change the ram size. So then lets say someone created a large application which used all ram minus 1 byte. We inherit this application from another coder and know nothing about it. We know it compiles and runs fine. We...
- Sat Mar 08, 2014 2:01 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Confusion with calculation of ram usage
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8657
Re: Confusion with calculation of ram usage
wOW that is some automatic array size! I usually try to keep automatic variables less than 300 bytes. But then, that's. Just me... Chris Mainly it was for example, but lets talk about your comment as i am curious and it may help to see where i am jacked up at. If there was a global array and i need...
- Sat Mar 08, 2014 12:11 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Confusion with calculation of ram usage
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8657
Confusion with calculation of ram usage
Before i start, i am beyond embarrassed to ask this question. At the same time i am man enough to admit my shortcomings and ask the question for clarity to make me better. After all these years of coding i just noticed this today, which is what blows my mind. In a nut shell why does the ram usage ca...
- Thu Feb 27, 2014 4:45 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: NetBurner Developer Training in Las Vegas
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5324
Re: NetBurner Developer Training in Las Vegas
I hope you have plans on setting up a camera to record the classroom events for those who cannot make it.
- Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:59 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: MOD5234 - problem with float-to-string routines
- Replies: 12
- Views: 10000
Re: MOD5234 - problem with float-to-string routines
I know this may not help all to much as i dont have a MOD5234 laying around, But i did try it on a Nano and the result was "Value = 0.100"
- Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:47 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Checksum fail
- Replies: 18
- Views: 8192
Re: Checksum fail
I do not know if the new MOD5441x suffers from a similar even the rest do. Have you tried powering the kit down then back up to gain serial access ?
- Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:06 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: SetNewGetHandler return value
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4701
Re: SetNewGetHandler return value
Sorry, MyDoGet.
- Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:37 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: SetNewGetHandler return value
- Replies: 7
- Views: 4701
Re: SetNewGetHandler return value
I have seen examples with return 0 and return 1 and also return ( *oldhand ) ( sock, url, rxBuffer );
so i became curious about the differences between them.
so i became curious about the differences between them.