Search found 67 matches
- Fri Feb 09, 2018 6:05 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: MOD54415 IRQ Issue / NNDK 2.7.7
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4126
Re: MOD54415 IRQ Issue / NNDK 2.7.7
Ok, this has gotten me closer. I took out all of my init stuff, and replaced it with some simple stuff: SetPinIrq( 26, 1, &SyncEncDummy); // IRQ 3 SetPinIrq( 43, 1, &DataDoneDummy); // IRQ 2 SetPinIrq( 45, 1, &FireDoneDummy); // IRQ 1 J2[47].function( PINJ2_47_GPIO ); J2[47] = 0; And now...
- Thu Feb 08, 2018 7:23 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: MOD54415 IRQ Issue / NNDK 2.7.7
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4126
Re: MOD54415 IRQ Issue / NNDK 2.7.7
One thing about that example program. Why doesn't EdgeportISR() have to be defined in the INTERRUPT macro? - Dan B.
- Thu Feb 08, 2018 7:17 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: MOD54415 IRQ Issue / NNDK 2.7.7
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4126
Re: MOD54415 IRQ Issue / NNDK 2.7.7
Thanks, pbreed, I'll try that and get back. - Dan B.
- Thu Feb 08, 2018 7:14 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: MOD54415 IRQ Issue / NNDK 2.7.7
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4126
Re: MOD54415 IRQ Issue / NNDK 2.7.7
Hi Tom, thanks for replying. I just want to mention the real functions don't do that. I have a specialized debug command that tests the IRQs individually, and it's only there so I can see something happened. Originally, the test functions kept all of the interrupts masked, and I just had a tight whi...
- Thu Feb 08, 2018 8:26 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: MOD54415 IRQ Issue / NNDK 2.7.7
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4126
MOD54415 IRQ Issue / NNDK 2.7.7
I'm trying to configure IRQs 1, 2, and 3 as edgeport irq, positive edge trigger, priority/level not important. I began to think I was using the included functions for this incorrectly, so I decided to just write my own configuration section. Please excuse the long setup to the question. // Before I ...
- Thu Dec 07, 2017 4:12 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Support Life for MOD5270B
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4906
Support Life for MOD5270B
Hi, I know nothing lasts forever, but I'm wondering if you have an expected support life for the MOD5270B board, or maybe put another way, for how much longer will I be able to buy them? Thanks, Dan B.
- Wed Dec 06, 2017 8:32 am
- Forum: NetBurner Hardware
- Topic: Porting from MOD5272 to MOD5270
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7381
Re: Porting from MOD5272 to MOD5270
Hi Keith, Not to answer for NetBurner, but I don't think the ADC pins are duplexed with Port pins. When I look at page 2-5 in the MCF5441X Reference Manual V4, it looks like some of them are duplexed with a DAC, but none are duplexed with GPIO. I take it you can't make a hardware change, like a latc...
- Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:22 am
- Forum: NetBurner Hardware
- Topic: Porting from MOD5272 to MOD5270
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7381
Re: Porting from MOD5272 to MOD5270
Yeah, so on Page 5 of the "Pinout and Signal Description" PDF for the MOD5270, it lists pins 6-13, 15-20 as Data Bus - Data xx, where xx is 15-0. In mod5272_datasheet_pinout_diagram, those same pins are just listed as PCxx, where they can be used as general purpose I/O. What I'm wondering ...
- Thu Oct 12, 2017 10:44 am
- Forum: NetBurner Hardware
- Topic: Porting from MOD5272 to MOD5270
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7381
Re: Porting from MOD5272 to MOD5270
I don't disagree, and I'm moving in that direction ultimately. But the problem is, for that one, the package size is different, and I literally have to redesign the rest of my product to make space for it. We're a 10# of crap in a 5# bag kind of place, and I just don't have .3" of extra space f...
- Thu Oct 12, 2017 5:38 am
- Forum: NetBurner Hardware
- Topic: Porting from MOD5272 to MOD5270
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7381
Re: Porting from MOD5272 to MOD5270
In my MOD5272 design, I use some of the Port C pins for GPIO. I see that's configurable on this processor, but I'm wondering if I can set the data bus to just 16 bits, or will that screw up something on the Netburner module itself?