Hello,
I see from header config_obj.h https://www.netburner.com/NBDocs/Developer/html/config__obj_8h.html that there is a call to SaveConfigToStorage.
Is there a way to Load configurations from the Config Server’s flash storage? Something like LoadConfigFromStorage?
I am trying to load IP ...
Search found 15 matches
- Mon Jul 28, 2025 9:34 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Load Configuration Server configs from non-volatile storage
- Replies: 0
- Views: 531
- Mon Jul 21, 2025 6:18 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Updating system libraries to support custom SFIO (on MOD54415)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 66120
Re: Updating system libraries to support custom SFIO (on MOD54415)
I ended up receiving support after opening up a ticket, since my scenario is unique.
Here are some take-aways from the discussion:
1. The only pure firmware-based solution to the above problem is bit-banging
1.png
2. Bit-banging is much slower - it depends on the baud rate of the master
2 ...
Here are some take-aways from the discussion:
1. The only pure firmware-based solution to the above problem is bit-banging
1.png
2. Bit-banging is much slower - it depends on the baud rate of the master
2 ...
- Wed Jul 16, 2025 12:15 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Updating system libraries to support custom SFIO (on MOD54415)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 66120
Updating system libraries to support custom SFIO (on MOD54415)
Hello,
Apologies in advance if this question has already been answered elsewhere. I think this is a similar question, but it is for MODM7AE70 (ARM) instead of MOD5XXX (Coldfire): https://forum.embeddedethernet.com/viewtopic.php?p=12395&hilit=pin#p12395
I have a MOD54415, and I am looking to ...
Apologies in advance if this question has already been answered elsewhere. I think this is a similar question, but it is for MODM7AE70 (ARM) instead of MOD5XXX (Coldfire): https://forum.embeddedethernet.com/viewtopic.php?p=12395&hilit=pin#p12395
I have a MOD54415, and I am looking to ...
- Fri Jun 20, 2025 8:34 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Docker and/or command-line builds of NNDK v2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 33834
Re: Docker and/or command-line builds of NNDK v2
Hi,
We would prefer not to move over to NNDK v3 after all because we would like to ensure that bug fixes and patches for one platform can be ported to our legacy platforms (like e.g. MOD5282) which don’t support NNDK v3.
We are trying to automate our builds in CI, and Docker would be preferable to ...
We would prefer not to move over to NNDK v3 after all because we would like to ensure that bug fixes and patches for one platform can be ported to our legacy platforms (like e.g. MOD5282) which don’t support NNDK v3.
We are trying to automate our builds in CI, and Docker would be preferable to ...
- Thu Jun 19, 2025 11:51 am
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Docker and/or command-line builds of NNDK v2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 33834
Re: Docker and/or command-line builds of NNDK v2
Hi. Thanks for the quick response.
NNDK v2.9.7 only has Windows and Mac releases, and I confirmed that their m68k-elf-gnu cross-build toolchains will NOT run on Linux (“Exec format error”). As a result, Linux Docker is not possible without more support.
If there is release of NNDK v2.X.X for Linux ...
NNDK v2.9.7 only has Windows and Mac releases, and I confirmed that their m68k-elf-gnu cross-build toolchains will NOT run on Linux (“Exec format error”). As a result, Linux Docker is not possible without more support.
If there is release of NNDK v2.X.X for Linux ...
- Wed Jun 18, 2025 12:26 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Software
- Topic: Docker and/or command-line builds of NNDK v2
- Replies: 5
- Views: 33834
Docker and/or command-line builds of NNDK v2
Hi,
We have recently ported our application from NNDK 2.7.3 to NNDK 2.9.7.
Currently all of our development is done on Windows with NBEclipse. However we are looking to start building using the CLI, in particular within a Docker container.
I noticed this repo which seems to support building NNDK ...
We have recently ported our application from NNDK 2.7.3 to NNDK 2.9.7.
Currently all of our development is done on Windows with NBEclipse. However we are looking to start building using the CLI, in particular within a Docker container.
I noticed this repo which seems to support building NNDK ...
- Wed Jun 18, 2025 12:13 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Hardware
- Topic: Factory state of Netburner (MODXXXX) products
- Replies: 2
- Views: 116169
Re: Factory state of Netburner (MODXXXX) products
This can be closed. Discovered later that a factory application (with AutoUpdate built-in) is indeed running on the products out-of-the-box.
- Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:00 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Hardware
- Topic: Factory state of Netburner (MODXXXX) products
- Replies: 2
- Views: 116169
Factory state of Netburner (MODXXXX) products
Hello,
I’m wondering what is the factory state of the MODXXXX line of products.
Is there an HTTP server that is part of the of the pre-flashed .s19 application? Can I detect the board IP address using IPSetup when it is in its factory state and reprogram it using AutoUpdate (once I am on the same ...
I’m wondering what is the factory state of the MODXXXX line of products.
Is there an HTTP server that is part of the of the pre-flashed .s19 application? Can I detect the board IP address using IPSetup when it is in its factory state and reprogram it using AutoUpdate (once I am on the same ...
- Sun May 11, 2025 6:40 pm
- Forum: NetBurner Hardware
- Topic: Migrating from EOL MOD5282 to a replacement supporting CAN
- Replies: 4
- Views: 61453
Re: Migrating from EOL MOD5282 to a replacement supporting CAN
Hi Tom,
Maybe the fact that there would be much change to the codebase suggested that it would be a great deal of logic change. I did not mean that.
Rather, I just meant that there would be a great deal of change in terms of lines of code. This based on the fact that, for example:
- all basic ...
Maybe the fact that there would be much change to the codebase suggested that it would be a great deal of logic change. I did not mean that.
Rather, I just meant that there would be a great deal of change in terms of lines of code. This based on the fact that, for example:
- all basic ...
- Mon May 05, 2025 11:23 am
- Forum: NetBurner Hardware
- Topic: Migrating from EOL MOD5282 to a replacement supporting CAN
- Replies: 4
- Views: 61453
Re: Migrating from EOL MOD5282 to a replacement supporting CAN
Hi TomNB,
I just realized I should probably have responded last week to let you know that I found the above information very useful! Thank you!
I was waiting to see whether my team would decide go with MOD54415 or MODM7AE70 given the above information. However, they have not yet made a decision ...
I just realized I should probably have responded last week to let you know that I found the above information very useful! Thank you!
I was waiting to see whether my team would decide go with MOD54415 or MODM7AE70 given the above information. However, they have not yet made a decision ...